| |
In Early Modern England, both gender hierarchy, with
the man at the top, and the husband's role as governor
of his family and household — wife, children, wards, and
servants — were assumed to have been instituted by God
and nature. The family was seen as the secure foundation
of society, with the husbands role being comparable to
that of God within his universe or the King within his
country. Women were continually instructed that their
spiritual and social worth resided above all else in
their practice of and reputation for chastity. Unmarried
virgins and wives were to maintain silence in the public
sphere and give unstinting obedience to father and
husband, though widows had some scope for making their
own decisions and managing their affairs. Children and
servants were bound to the strictest obedience.
Inevitably, however, tension developed when such norms
met with common experience.
Religious and legal definitions of gender roles and
norms are proclaimed in the marriage liturgy from the
Book of Common Prayer and in
The Law's Resolutions of
Women's Rights (1632).
These norms were urged and modified in advice books
dealing with specific family roles and duties. A
treatise on household government by John Dod and Robert
Cleaver (1598) elaborates on and contrasts the duties of
husband and wife. Gervase Markham's book, The English
Hus-Wife (1615), outlines the woman's responsibility to
understand and administer medicines to her family and to
have perfect skill in cookery. Richard Brathwaite's
English Gentlewoman (1631) focuses on virtues and
activities pertaining to women of the higher classes,
drawing attention to expectations of widows' chastity.
Dorothy Leigh's often reprinted advice book The Mother's
Blessing (1616) emphasised: the need to bring up
children with gentleness and to give them a good
education. She also urges her sons only to marry women
they will love to the end and to make their wives
companions, not servants.
Some texts reveal direct challenges to the cultural
norms defining gender and household roles. A pair of
texts, Hic Mulier and Haec Vir (1620), call attention to
a controversy from the years 1615–20 over women wearing
male attire; their title-page engravings display the
satirised fashions. (Cross
Dressing)
Return to the top of the page...
|
|